For decades, tennis coaching has been built on repetition, basket drills, model-based instruction, and endless rallies.
It looks impressive.
It sounds productive.
But it rarely creates adaptable, match-ready players.

In a recent long-form conversation with Bren Veziroglu, we explored how ecological dynamics reshapes how we see skill, learning, and performance in tennis. Here are the key takeaways that every coach should reflect on.

1. The Fastest Way to Learn Is to Compete

One of Bren’s points hit hard:

“The fastest way to get a right answer is to give a wrong one.”

In practice, that means you learn most by acting, failing, and adjusting, not by rehearsing movements in isolation.
Competition forces players to adapt in real time, to perceive, decide, and act under pressure.

It’s why I encourage players to start competing early. Even if they lose, they gain the feedback and awareness that no drill can ever replicate.

And yet, in tennis, we still train players for hours without opponents, without the very problems they’ll face in matches.

2. The Illusion of Learning

In Spain, basket feeding is so common it’s literally called “suffering.”
Players hit thousands of unopposed balls while the coach shouts instructions.
It looks like intensity and progress, but it’s often an illusion.

When we actually examine successful players, the real learning happens in opposed, dynamic, high-information environments, match play, live hitting, and problem-solving situations.

The suffering isn’t where the learning happens. It’s just where the coach feels in control.

3. Every Point Starts With a Serve

One of the most powerful shifts I’ve made: we never start practice without a serve.

Every point in tennis starts with one, so every session should too.
Yet traditional coaching often isolates the serve, treating it as a separate technical skill.

When you start every task with a serve, even a scaled one, you connect technique, perception, and decision-making. You also remove the fear and overemphasis that surround serving in competition.

Over time, the serve becomes normal, just another part of play, not a pressure trigger.

4. Learning Lives in Discomfort

I often tell players:

“If you look comfortable, I’ll make you uncomfortable.”

That’s not cruelty, it’s coaching.
Learning happens at the edge of stability, where players are slightly destabilized, stretched, and forced to recalibrate.

We use score pressure, bad line calls, environmental changes, and momentum shifts to recreate the chaos of real competition.
That’s where emotional control, resilience, and adaptability grow.

As Nadal once said, “I don’t learn from my wins. I learn from my losses.”

5. The Myth of Fundamentals

Coaches love to talk about “the basics.”
But what are fundamentals, really?

A four-year-old already has fundamentals, they can walk, run, and reach.
They can grasp a racket. They can move through space.
We don’t need to start from zero. We need to build on what’s already there.

Every new player comes with a history of movement and perception. They already understand competition, even if it’s just from playground games. Coaching should connect to that, not strip it away.

6. Let the Game Be the Teacher (With Intention)

When I left players to their own devices in one experiment, they didn’t start doing basket drills.
They started playing matches.

They changed constraints themselves. They adjusted rules to make games fair and fun. They created their own learning environment, without a single command from me.

That’s the power of autonomy and intention.
When players have ownership, curiosity drives learning.

But intention still matters. The game alone isn’t enough. Players must know what they’re trying to do.
If the goal is to “jam” an opponent, their attention will naturally shift toward affordances that help them do that.

Clear intention guides attention.
And attention guides adaptation.

7. The Problem With Rallying

Most coaches and players still start lessons by “rallying.”
It’s seen as a warm-up, a confidence builder.

But rallying teaches the wrong intention:

“Keep the ball going.”

Tennis isn’t about keeping the ball going, it’s about hitting the ball where your opponent can’t reach it.

That’s the real game.
So instead of rallying, we start every point with a serve and look to win or create advantage within the first four shots.
Those first exchanges are where most points, and most learning, actually happen.

8. Failure Isn’t the End. It’s Information.

When a player loses a match, I don’t console them, I congratulate them.
If you blew a 40–0 lead, great. You’ve just learned what that feels like.

Next time, you’ll handle it differently.
That’s learning.
That’s information.

Coaching isn’t about protecting players from discomfort. It’s about teaching them how to interpret it.

9. Tennis Is a Game of Losing

The best players in the world win just over half their points.
Novak Djokovic wins around 51%.
That means he loses 49 out of every 100 points.

Tennis is a game of losing.
The sooner players accept that, the freer they become to explore, fail, and adapt.

My players lose constantly in training, by design. Because each failure recalibrates perception, intention, and confidence.

10. Start at Seven

If practice design had a representativeness scale from 1–10, most coaches start at 1.
Throwing and catching. Basket drills. Isolated repetitions.

I start at 7.
Every task connects to the real game, with affordances, perception, and consequence intact.

The closer we keep practice to performance, the faster players learn.

The Real Shift

This conversation with Bren reaffirmed something simple but radical:
Humans learn best when the environment teaches them.

As coaches, our job isn’t to feed balls or perfect technique.
It’s to create environments rich in information, emotion, and consequence, where learning emerges through exploration and adaptation.

🎥 Watch the full conversation here

You’ll see how these ideas cross from tennis to martial arts, movement, and beyond.
The principles don’t change—just the environment.