Walk onto a tennis court anywhere in the world and you’ll probably see the same thing:
Basket drills.
Hand feeding.
Static reps.
A lot of clean technique—but very little actual tennis.

And yet, when those same players step into a match, their skills fall apart.

Why?

In this post, I want to share why unopposed practice—the kind coaches have been told builds confidence and consistency—actually holds players back. And how a shift toward ecological dynamics, constraints-led coaching, and representative learning offers a better way.

This isn’t just theory. It’s what I’ve lived, researched, and completely rebuilt in my own coaching over the past five years.

The Problem with Basket Drills: Control ≠ Learning

Basket drills feel safe.

You control the feed.
You isolate the skill.
You remove stress, opponents, decision-making.

It looks clean.
It feels like progress.
But as research from Perry et al. (2025) highlights, this kind of unopposed practice removes critical information—the very stuff players need to perform under real conditions.

Here’s what’s missing in basket-fed practice:

• No opponent = no tactical decisions
• No score = no emotional pressure
• No variability = no need to adapt
• No cause and effect = no feedback loop

You’re not training tennis.
You’re training stillness.

And when your player finally faces chaos—movement, pressure, unpredictability—they collapse. Not because they’re mentally weak. Because they never learned the skill in the first place.

Why Real Skill Is Contextual, Not Repeated

We’ve been sold the idea that “repetition builds skill.”

But repetition without context is just choreography.
And in tennis, the same forehand never shows up twice.

Each point changes:

• The ball trajectory
• Your position
• The opponent’s recovery
• The score
• Your emotional state

Skill, from an ecological dynamics perspective, is about adapting your movement in real time to the information available. This is called perception-action coupling.

You don’t hit a forehand because it’s stored in memory.
You hit a forehand because the environment invites it.

Take those invitations away?
You remove the learning.

That’s why players look great in a drill—but fall apart in a rally.

So What Actually Works?

Opposed practice.

Give players problems to solve.
Give them context.
Give them something to adapt to.

Examples:

• Floor tennis with real rules
• Balloon rallies with an objective
• Live serve + return with constraints
• Points where intention is clear: “stretch your opponent,” “survive the rally,” “jam the middle”

Let them play.
Then guide their attention, not their technique.

If a beginner struggles, don’t remove the game.
Shrink it. Slow it. Simplify the constraints—but keep the context.

That’s what the Constraints-Led Approach (CLA) is about.
Not just adding random rules. But guiding intention, shaping perception, and keeping learning representative.

Final Thought

For 18 years, I used basket drills.
My players looked great in lessons.
But couldn’t play matches.

I thought it was their fault.
Maybe they weren’t focused enough.
Maybe they lacked confidence.

Turns out, the problem was the environment I built for them.

Coaching isn’t about getting players to move “correctly.”
It’s about helping them move effectively, under pressure, with purpose.

That doesn’t happen in silence. Or stillness.
It happens in motion.
In matches.
In chaos.

If you want players to transfer their skills—teach in the world they’ll compete in.

Want to explore this further each week?
Join my free newsletter, The Coaching Playbook, for weekly coaching insights, practice design ideas, and real lessons from the court.