I Gave Up Tennis Drills… And THIS Happened

Steve reflects on a pivotal coaching experience that led them to abandon traditional drills like basket feeding. They emphasize that such methods often hinder skill transfer and reduce enjoyment. By adopting ecological dynamics and constraints-led coaching, players became more adaptive, problem-solving, and fulfilled, while the coach found greater satisfaction and effectiveness.

How many times have you watched a player nail their forehand in practice—only to crumble when match pressure hits? Or seen your player hit perfect serves in warm-up, then double fault three times in a row during a tiebreak?

I’ve been there. And for a long time, I blamed the player. I thought they needed more reps, more basket feeding, more “perfect” technique. But four years ago, I hit my breaking point—and gave up traditional drills entirely.

Here’s what happened next.


🎾 The Breaking Point: “Just Feed More Balls”

Let me take you back to one of the most pivotal moments in my coaching career. I was coaching a young boy named Toby. I was stressed, overworked, and preparing for my wedding. That week, my coaching patience was thin—and during one session, I snapped. I shouted at him.

Toby’s mum calmly confronted me afterward, and I’ll never forget what she said:

“I understand your frustration—but that wasn’t okay.”

She was right. I blamed Toby for not getting it. But the truth was: the drill I created was flawed. I’d set up an isolated, closed practice that removed all the key elements of the actual game. It was sterile. Rigid. And when Toby did something creative, I told him it was wrong.

That moment changed everything.


🔁 Why I Ditched Basket Feeding

I stopped basket feeding not because it’s evil—but because it wasn’t working.

  • Players weren’t enjoying the sessions.
  • I was stressed, frustrated, and burnt out.
  • The skills never transferred into match play.
  • I kept saying, “They just need more reps,” but it never worked.

I started exploring ecological dynamics and constraints-led coaching. Instead of feeding 100 forehands, I built games where players had to move, adapt, and make decisions under pressure.

It wasn’t easy. It felt chaotic. Messy. But that chaos was where learning lived.


🧠 What Actually Changed

Here’s what started to happen when I gave up traditional drills:

1. Skill Emerged Organically

I watched beginner players develop touch, timing, and tactics through creative games. One session, my most boisterous group of 10-year-old boys started hitting drop shots and angles—without me instructing them.

2. I Became Less Stressed, More Fulfilled

No more shouting. No more frustration. I laughed more. My players laughed more. The sessions became fun, engaging, and full of purpose.

3. Players Learned to Problem Solve

Instead of relying on me for answers, they began solving tactical and technical problems themselves. I became a guide, not a commander.

4. Movement Quality Improved Without Explicit Cues

No more “bend your knees” or “elbow at 90 degrees.” I changed the task and the court, and movement solutions began to emerge naturally.


🛠 The Power of Constraints

Let me give you a real example.

I had a player who struggled with blocking returns. Telling him what to do didn’t work. So I said:

“You’re not allowed to let the serve bounce. You’ve got to volley the return.”

At first, he was confused. Then he missed. Then he adapted. Within minutes, he was moving forward and blocking returns like I’d never seen before.

That’s repetition without repetition. That’s emergent skill.


🧩 The Illusion of Learning in Drills

Basket feeding looks effective. The coach is active. Balls are flying. Players are sweating.

But here’s the truth: it often creates the illusion of learning, not real learning.

If there’s no decision-making, no variability, and no adaptation, there’s no skill transfer.

You can hit 100 forehands perfectly… but under pressure, in match conditions, it’ll break down—because context is everything.


💬 “But It Builds Confidence!”

Some coaches say basket feeding builds confidence. My response?

It builds fake confidence.

When players succeed in unrealistic drills, they feel good—until reality hits in a match. Then that confidence evaporates.

Real confidence comes from knowing you’ve faced pressure, made decisions, and adapted in training that looks and feels like the game.


💡 When Might Drills Be Useful?

I’m not dogmatic. There are rare situations where I’ll use basket feeding:

  • A highly experienced player working on a precise movement pattern in a specific context.
  • A warm-up for feel or activation—not skill development.
  • A moment of calm in a chaotic session.

But I always explain that it’s not for learning—it’s for something else. And it’s never the foundation of the session.


🧭 Reframing Coaching for Parents

One reason coaches fall back on drills? Pressure to look like coaching is happening.

So I created a document for parents that explains:

  • Who I am
  • Why I coach the way I do
  • What my sessions look, feel, and sound like
  • Why it may differ from traditional coaches

Setting expectations from the start reduces confusion, builds trust, and supports long-term growth.


🧠 Final Thoughts: I Stopped Controlling. Learning Started.

Letting go of drills felt like giving up control.

But coaching isn’t about control. It’s about creating environments where learning happens, not just skills are shown.

Today, my players:

  • Adapt under pressure
  • Solve problems independently
  • Enjoy their sessions more
  • Retain their skills better
  • Transfer training to competition

And I’m a better coach. Happier. More fulfilled. Less burnt out. More effective.


🎯 If You’re Ready to Ditch the Drills…

…you’re not alone.

Thousands of coaches are quietly asking the same questions I did: Is there a better way?
The answer is yes—and I’ve built a roadmap for it.

👉 Join my email list below to get weekly coaching insights, resources, and real-world examples of ecological, game-based training that works.

Let’s change coaching—for ourselves and our players.

Join the Coaching Evolution

Practical tools, fresh ideas, and real solutions for busy tennis coaches who want to do less, and coach better

    READ THESE NEXT

    Join the Coaching Evolution

    Practical tools, fresh ideas, and real solutions for busy tennis coaches who want to do less and coach better

    Join The Coaches Playbook Newsletter Today

      We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.

      JOIN THE COACHING EVOLUTION

      Practical tools, fresh ideas, and real solutions for busy tennis coaches who want to do less, and coach better

        About the Author

        Written by Steve Whelan

        Steve Whelan is a tennis coach, coach educator, and researcher with 24+ years of on-court experience working across grassroots, performance, and coach development environments. His work focuses on how players actually learn, specialising in practice design, skill transfer, and ecological dynamics in tennis.

        Steve has presented at national and international coaching conferences, contributed to coach education programmes, and published work exploring intention, attention, affordances, and representative learning design in tennis. His writing bridges academic research and real-world coaching, helping coaches move beyond drills toward practices that hold up under match pressure.

        He is the founder of My Tennis Coaching and My Tennis Coach Academy, a global learning community for coaches seeking modern, evidence-informed approaches to player development.

        👉 Learn more about Steve’s coaching journey and philosophy here:
        About / My Journey

        Leave a Reply

        Discover more from My Tennis Coaching

        Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

        Continue reading