5 Common Mistakes Coaches Make When Shifting to Constraints-Led Coaching (And How to Fix Them)

Adopting the Constraints-Led Approach (CLA) in coaching has advantages, but transitioning can be challenging. Coaches often make mistakes such as overloading constraints, misaligning them with outcomes, over-coaching, expecting instant results, and neglecting player input. By simplifying constraints, aligning them with real game scenarios, and fostering player reflection, coaches can enhance effectiveness and engagement.

Adopting the Constraints-Led Approach (CLA) can be a game-changer for your coaching, but like any new method, the transition comes with its challenges. Many coaches find their first attempts at constraints-led practices falling flat, leaving them unsure of what went wrong. Don’t worry—these early hurdles are common, and with a little guidance, you can avoid the pitfalls and unlock the true potential of CLA.

Here are five common mistakes coaches make when shifting to constraints-led coaching and how to fix them:

1. Overloading the Session with Too Many Constraints

The Mistake: In an eagerness to embrace CLA, some coaches overload players with multiple constraints at once. For example, asking players to focus on hitting to a target, following specific movement patterns, and adapting to modified equipment—all in one drill.

Why It’s a Problem: Too many constraints can overwhelm players, making it difficult for them to focus on the key learning objectives. This confusion often leads to frustration and disengagement.

How to Fix It: Start simple. Focus on one or two key constraints that align with your session’s main objective. Gradually add complexity as players become more comfortable. For example, begin with a task constraint like “only crosscourt shots count” before layering in additional challenges.


2. Failing to Align Constraints with the Desired Outcome

The Mistake: Some coaches introduce constraints that don’t directly support the skill or behavior they want to develop. For instance, creating a rule that doesn’t reflect the realities of match play.

Why It’s a Problem: Misaligned constraints can lead to practice scenarios that feel disconnected from the game, reducing their effectiveness and leaving players wondering how the drill translates to competition.

How to Fix It: Use representative learning design. Ensure that the constraints mirror real game situations and the decisions players will face in matches. For example, if you want players to improve their net play, design a drill where they must adapt to volleys under varying ball speeds and trajectories.


3. Over-Coaching or Providing Too Many Instructions

The Mistake: In an effort to guide players through the drill, coaches often fall into the trap of over-coaching, providing excessive verbal cues or step-by-step instructions.

Why It’s a Problem: Over-coaching disrupts the perception-action coupling process and stifles the players’ ability to explore and discover solutions independently.

How to Fix It: Adopt a hands-off approach. Allow players to experiment within the constraints and make their own adjustments. Use open-ended questions like, “What did you notice about your positioning?” or “How could you adjust to hit more effectively?” to guide reflection without dictating.


4. Expecting Immediate Results

The Mistake: Coaches often expect players to master the new approach right away and become frustrated when they don’t see instant improvements.

Why It’s a Problem: Constraints-led practices are designed for long-term skill development, not quick fixes. Expecting immediate results can lead to premature abandonment of the approach.

How to Fix It: Be patient and trust the process. Progress may not be immediately visible, but over time, players will develop a deeper understanding and adaptability. Reinforce the long-term benefits with players and celebrate small improvements along the way.


5. Neglecting Player Input and Reflection

The Mistake: Some coaches overlook the importance of involving players in the learning process, treating constraints-led drills as just another task to complete rather than an opportunity for active engagement and reflection.

Why It’s a Problem: Without reflection, players may not fully grasp the purpose of the constraints or understand how their actions contribute to the desired outcome.

How to Fix It: Build reflection into your sessions. After each drill, ask players to share what they learned and how they adapted to the constraints. Encourage them to think critically about their decisions and movements. This fosters ownership and reinforces the learning process.


Ready to Avoid These Mistakes?

Transitioning to constraints-led coaching requires a mindset shift, but with the right strategies, you can create engaging, effective sessions that drive long-term improvement.

To help you get started, I’ve put together a free PDF: 5 Game-Changing Drills designed to avoid these pitfalls and maximize your success with CLA. Download it now and take the first step toward transforming your coaching!

Join the Coaching Evolution

Practical tools, fresh ideas, and real solutions for busy tennis coaches who want to do less, and coach better

    READ THESE NEXT

    Join the Coaching Evolution

    Practical tools, fresh ideas, and real solutions for busy tennis coaches who want to do less and coach better

    Join The Coaches Playbook Newsletter Today

      We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.

      JOIN THE COACHING EVOLUTION

      Practical tools, fresh ideas, and real solutions for busy tennis coaches who want to do less, and coach better

        About the Author

        Written by Steve Whelan

        Steve Whelan is a tennis coach, coach educator, and researcher with 24+ years of on-court experience working across grassroots, performance, and coach development environments. His work focuses on how players actually learn, specialising in practice design, skill transfer, and ecological dynamics in tennis.

        Steve has presented at national and international coaching conferences, contributed to coach education programmes, and published work exploring intention, attention, affordances, and representative learning design in tennis. His writing bridges academic research and real-world coaching, helping coaches move beyond drills toward practices that hold up under match pressure.

        He is the founder of My Tennis Coaching and My Tennis Coach Academy, a global learning community for coaches seeking modern, evidence-informed approaches to player development.

        👉 Learn more about Steve’s coaching journey and philosophy here:
        About / My Journey

        Leave a Reply

        Discover more from My Tennis Coaching

        Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

        Continue reading