The My Tennis Coaching podcast discusses the dangers of misinformation in tennis coaching, particularly on social media. A recent incident involved a coach criticizing another’s methods publicly. The host emphasizes modern coaching should prioritize player autonomy and understanding over outdated methods, urging critical evaluation of coaching practices and social media credibility.

Steve reflects on 24 years of tennis coaching and concludes that traditional basket feeding methods hinder real player development. They argue it creates dependence and stifles adaptability. The piece advocates for designing game-like environments that foster decision-making, problem-solving, and autonomy, emphasizing that true coaching prioritizes player growth over superficial appearances.

The post critiques traditional learning methods derived from Taylorism, emphasizing that human learning is messy and involves real-time interaction rather than mere repetition. It advocates for a coaching approach that focuses on creating representative environments, encouraging exploration, and understanding that mistakes are part of the learning process.

It’s Not Copying. It’s Solving the Same Problem. One of the most common questions in tennis coaching is: “If there’s no ideal model, why do…

Private tennis lessons, regarded as essential for player development, may be overrated. Traditional coaching supports their use, but Ecological Dynamics argues that real learning requires interaction with varied environments. Group sessions offer cost-effective, game-like scenarios that foster decision-making and peer learning. It’s time to rethink the emphasis on private lessons for authentic player growth.

The backhand in tennis is often undertrained compared to the forehand, despite its importance. To build backhand confidence, practice should focus on intentional volume and decision-making. A constraint-style drill, allowing players only backhands, helps them develop defensive skills and better control, ultimately preparing them for real match situations.

This guide emphasizes the importance of early competition for players, encouraging play as a learning tool. It advocates for adaptable training, focusing on behavioral goals and managing pre-match nerves rather than perfect technique. Competition should be viewed as an opportunity for growth, resilience, and enjoyment in the game, fostering player confidence.

Many coaches focus primarily on technique while neglecting players’ mental challenges. Signs indicating a need for mental training include discomfort in competition, poor body language after mistakes, a tendency to play it safe under pressure, externalizing blame, and struggling with momentum shifts. Integrating mental training into regular sessions is essential for developing resilient players.

Mid-season challenges coaches to manage player intensity effectively to prevent burnout while maintaining performance. Key strategies include assessing daily readiness, balancing recovery with intensity using a 2:1 ratio, adjusting practices around match schedules, monitoring motivation, and reflecting weekly on player engagement. Adaptability is essential for sustaining optimal player performance.

Mid-season slumps can hinder player development, as enthusiasm and performance may wane. Key signs include performance plateaus, lack of engagement, increased mental errors, physical fatigue, and negative self-talk. Coaches can address these issues by varying practices, encouraging reflection, prioritizing recovery, and focusing on effort. Slumps offer growth opportunities if managed effectively.