My Lens

When I first dove into the world of ecological dynamics, it didn’t just add a new layer to my coaching techniques—it completely transformed the way I perceive coaching. This shift has deeply influenced my professional life, sometimes complicating it but always enriching it.

The Inescapable Ecological Perspective

Over the past few years, through reading, listening, discussing, and most importantly, practicing, I’ve fully embraced a more ecological approach to coaching. This perspective has become so integral to my way of thinking that I find it impossible to observe any tennis lesson or game without applying this lens. Whether I’m watching clips online, observing live lessons, or engaging in discussions with fellow coaches, questions about the representativeness of the exercises, the value of the coach’s communication, and the purpose behind the players’ actions constantly flood my mind.

I’ve grown increasingly critical of traditional training routines that focus purely on repetition for the sake of muscle memory or “perfecting” technique. These methods, which often include endless rallying or isolated, explicit instruction, seem increasingly out of touch with how humans naturally engage and learn from their environment.

The Challenge of Questioning Norms

Questioning the status quo can be isolating. It’s often met with resistance from peers who are accustomed to the traditional, explicit, coach-led style of coaching. I find myself disengaging when I hear justifications for practice that revolve around creating repeatable techniques or enforcing rigid structures—approaches that research shows are less effective in dynamic sports like tennis.

The real challenge comes when discussing these topics with other coaches. While I relish a good debate on coaching methodologies, it becomes frustrating when the counterarguments are based on what “pros do” or what another coach’s successful methods are perceived to be. These are not justifications but rather assumptions that fail to consider the nuances of how learning actually occurs.

Backing Up Beliefs with Research

In contrast, when I discuss my coaching philosophy, I ensure it’s backed up with solid research. Concepts like perception-action coupling, affordances, and the focus of attention (internal vs. external) are not mere theories but are grounded in how humans behave and learn, particularly in dynamic environments.

When fellow coaches default to traditional methods without understanding why or how different approaches might be more effective, it not only limits their coaching potential but also the developmental potential of their players.

Sticking to My Guns

Despite the challenges and occasional doubts from peers, players, or their parents—who might see my less interventionist approach as unconventional or even ineffective—I remain committed to my ecological perspective. For me, the box of traditional coaching has been opened, revealing a world where player-centered learning and interaction with the environment lead to deeper, more meaningful skill development.

Conclusion: The Path Forward

As I continue on this path, I invite fellow coaches, players, and parents to explore these ideas with me. Understand that while the traditional methods are familiar and comfortable, they may not always be the best way to foster genuine talent and adaptability in players.

I encourage anyone curious about this approach or those who wish to discuss their views on tennis coaching to reach out. Your questions and insights are invaluable as we all strive to better understand and enhance the way we teach and play the game of tennis. Send your thoughts to steve@mytenniscoaching.com, and let’s open up a broader conversation about the future of tennis coaching.